The right ingredients for complex litigation in Louisiana.

Keogh Cox helps clients resolve complex legal matters across Louisiana, efficiently, strategically, and with a personal touch.

For over 50 years, companies, insurers, government agencies, and professionals have relied on our team to handle their high-stakes cases. Our Louisiana roots blend with our seasoned experience to position us to navigate your complex legal challenges.

Serving Louisiana’s Key Industries & Practice Areas

Our litigation attorneys bring knowledge to a wide range of legal challenges.

Business Law & Litigation

business_center

Complex Litigation

gavel

Construction

front_loader

Health Care

health_and_safety

Industrial Accidents

emergency_home

Insurance

shield_with_house

Merchant & Premises Liability

store

Professional Liability

contract_edit

Workers' Compensation

personal_injury

The Right Ingredients

menu_book
Proven Experience
skillet
Strategic Problem-Solving
dine_in
Client-Focused Approach
award_meal
Recognized Excellence

Why Louisiana’s Leading Industries Trust Keogh Cox

In litigation, results matter, and so do the people delivering them. Our team of litigators is known for solving complex cases strategically, with clarity and a level of care that makes a lasting impression.

Blog

Explore perspectives on legal issues and rulings that are shaping litigation in Louisiana.

News

Keogh Cox congratulates Kirk L. Landry, member of the Louisiana Association of Defense Counsel Board of Directors.

Keogh Cox is pleased to congratulate Partner, Kirk L. Landry, who recently began his three-year term on the Board of Directors of the Louisiana Association of Defense Counsel!

https://www.ladc.org/leadership

Insight

Louisiana Court Finds No Coverage Under Policy Based Upon Insured’s Failure to Cooperate

In South Alexander Development I, LLC v. Markel American Insurance Co., the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana granted an insurer’s motion for summary judgment finding that the insured’s failure to cooperate violated the policy’s coverage terms and voided coverage.

The dispute arose from a commercial first-party property loss following Hurricane Ida. The insurer moved quickly to adjust the claim by retaining an independent adjuster and engineers to evaluate the damage to and value of the insured property. It also asked the insured to produce documentation needed to complete the adjustment, including records of installation costs, monthly revenues, and repair estimates. The insured did not respond.

Additionally, the insurer sent numerous emails over the course of the claim requesting information about (1) the costs the insured had incurred; (2) documentation supporting the income loss claim, along with quotes, estimates, and proposals for repairs; and (3) the scope of work for testing and repairs. However, most of these requests went unanswered.

Based on this evidence, the court determined that the insured violated the terms of the policy because it failed to cooperate with the insurer’s investigation. Most notably, the insured obtained repair estimates and proposals from its own contractor and withheld them from the insurer until after suit was filed. The insured also never submitted a completed proof of loss, even though the policy required submission of such a document that included estimates and “other reasonable information” the insurer needed to settle the loss. These acts showed the insured failed to “cooperate with [the insurer] in performing all acts required by this policy.”

The insurer showed that it pursued the information diligently and that the insured’s breach was both material and prejudicial. The court found (1) the insurer had documented repeated, specific requests for nearly a year, (2) the withheld documents went directly to quantifying the loss, and (3) the insured’s noncompliance deprived the insurer of its right to investigate the insured’s claim.

As a result, the court granted summary judgment finding no genuine issue of material fact relating to the insured’s breach of the policy’s cooperation clause. The insured was precluded from bringing a breach of insurance contract claim and therefore, without a valid contractual claim, the insured also could not pursue a bad faith claim against the insurer.

References:

South Alexander Development I, LLC v. Markel American Insurance Co., CV 23-1436-JWD-SDJ, 2026 WL 1819120 (M.D. La. June 24, 2026).

News

Keogh Cox has been ranked in the 2026 edition of Chambers USA.

Keogh Cox is pleased to announce that our firm has been ranked in the 2026 edition of Chambers USA for Construction in Louisiana for the second year. Additionally, Partner Mary Anne Wolf has been individually ranked by Chambers for her work in Construction. We are proud of the outstanding work done by our Construction Group who made this ranking possible.

Ranked Among Louisiana’s Leading Law Firms

From courtroom strategy to client care, Keogh Cox has built a reputation for high standards and results that stand out. Our accolades reflect the consistency and quality of our work across complex litigation.